Bangkok questions its own mass tourism model

Bangkok tourist destination Khao San Road is usually heaving with people on weekends, its cheap beer bars, tattoo parlours, street vendors, hostels and buzzing nightlife drawing budget travellers and tour groups alike.

On a recent Saturday evening, the street was deserted except for a few dozen locals who wandered past boarded up shops, ignoring restaurant staff calling out meal and drink deals, news agency Reuters reports in its industry feature.

Khao San Road clearly shows the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on Bangkok, the world’s most visited city for four consecutive years before a ban on international travel. “I have never seen it like this. Usually we don’t have time to stand for even a minute,” said a waitress who goes by the name Pookie.

“Lots of businesses have shut here, and if we don’t see foreign tourists coming back soon, we may also shut. There are some locals coming on the weekends, but that’s not enough to keep us all going,” she said, pointing to the empty tables.

After a record 39.8 million foreign visitors last year whose spending accounted to 11.4% of gross domestic product, Thailand had looked to welcome more than 40 million tourists this year, says Reuters. But with flight bans and quarantines, it expects only 8 million visitors this year.

The effect is keenly felt in Bangkok, where most tourists spend a night or two before heading to sandy beaches and hilltop Buddhist temples, with questions over whether the city should ditch the mass tourism model it has come to rely on, says Reuters.

It is a question many cities are grappling with, as the future of urban tourism is “deeply uncertain” in the short to medium term, said Tony Matthews, a senior lecturer in urban and environmental planning at Australia’s Griffith University.

“Cities that rely heavily on tourism are facing an extraordinary crisis. Do they wait it out until mass tourism is viable again, or do they start developing major new industries and economies?” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

“But you can’t easily retool an urban economy, and moving away from a tourism-dependent economic model is not easy unless there is something else ready to take over that’s at least as beneficial.”

With cheap air travel fuelling a boom in tourism in recent years, cities from Amsterdam to Sydney have struggled to balance the needs of local residents with the demands of visitors who boost the hospitality industry but can also cause damage, the Reuters report says.

Overcrowding can frustrate local residents, drive up rents, and put pressure on infrastructure including public transit and waste management, while also damaging the ecology and cultural and heritage assets, according to McKinsey Consulting.

With restrictions brought on by the coronavirus, some cities are changing their tourism-focused strategy.

Authorities in Barcelona said they would put “quality over quantity”, promoting local food and drawing more high spenders.

In Amsterdam, authorities said they would develop a so-called “doughnut” model that prioritises social and ecological goals for better living, including decent housing, healthcare, as well as climate action and biodiversity.

“With less future income from tourists, it makes sense for Amsterdam to try to improve its economic fundamentals in other ways,” said Matthews.

“But cities build up tourism profiles and associated economies over time. They come to depend on these and will not want to change their approach unless they have to.”

Thailand has shut some of its most popular beaches in recent years to allow fragile coral reefs to recover from pollution caused by tourism, and removed vendors from Khao San Road and other areas to appeal more to tourists.

There have also been efforts to discard Thailand’s seedy reputation, and the go-go-bars and soapy massage parlours that Bangkok and some beach towns are notorious for.

Now, authorities have the opportunity to move towards a more sustainable model, said David Robinson, a tourism expert who has long criticised authorities’ drive for quantity over quality.

“The race to the top of the ‘most visited’ chart does not benefit the country,” said Robinson, director of Bangkok River Partners, a network of riverside businesses that boost culture and heritage.

“More is just more, not better, and certainly not more financially beneficial to the country. It’s unsustainable.”